<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICANN Says:  Domaining is Bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 04:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jothan Frakes</title>
		<link>http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Jothan Frakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>I think there is blurring between editorial opinion and actual quotations.

I am going to defend Paul Twomey here.  

He would simply never speak ill of the domain marketplace or make statements like are present in this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is blurring between editorial opinion and actual quotations.</p>
<p>I am going to defend Paul Twomey here.  </p>
<p>He would simply never speak ill of the domain marketplace or make statements like are present in this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jason.  I&quot;ll make a separate post about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jason.  I&#8221;ll make a separate post about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Keenan</title>
		<link>http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/#comment-614</guid>
		<description>I have discussed this news report with Paul Twomey and he has asked me to clarity that the Gulf News article incorrectly suggests that he has concerns with domainers.

As he said to me:  &quot;When asked to look ahead at what might happen on the Internet, I did say it was likely domainers would move increasingly into the ccTLD space. In no way did I say or suggest that domainers were a negative force in any way and certainly did not refer to them as &quot;a downside.&quot; The many domainers I have met and chatted with at meetings across the globe will know I would never say such a thing.

As I noted in my closing remarks at the Dubai meeting, the marketplace has evolved and domainers are a part of the robust domain name market that exists today.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have discussed this news report with Paul Twomey and he has asked me to clarity that the Gulf News article incorrectly suggests that he has concerns with domainers.</p>
<p>As he said to me:  &#8220;When asked to look ahead at what might happen on the Internet, I did say it was likely domainers would move increasingly into the ccTLD space. In no way did I say or suggest that domainers were a negative force in any way and certainly did not refer to them as &#8220;a downside.&#8221; The many domainers I have met and chatted with at meetings across the globe will know I would never say such a thing.</p>
<p>As I noted in my closing remarks at the Dubai meeting, the marketplace has evolved and domainers are a part of the robust domain name market that exists today.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Domain Bits: ICANN Says: Domaining is Bad at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</title>
		<link>http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator> Domain Bits: ICANN Says: Domaining is Bad at Conceptualist.com, By Sahar Sarid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/#comment-604</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: Domain Bits [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: Domain Bits [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois</title>
		<link>http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainbits.com/icann-sucks/#comment-603</guid>
		<description>I am shocked by Twomey&#039;s words.
If now we also need to educate ICANN!?

This is why we must be united to defend our industry.
Join the ICA (InternetCommerce.org).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am shocked by Twomey&#8217;s words.<br />
If now we also need to educate ICANN!?</p>
<p>This is why we must be united to defend our industry.<br />
Join the ICA (InternetCommerce.org).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
